Media Network Rotating Header Image

Twitter’s block move ‘collaborating with censors’: RSF

Reporters Without Borders today slammed Twitter’s announcement that it could now block tweets from appearing in a specific country as “collaborating with the censors”. RSF’s head of social media, Lucie Morillon, said the organisation was “very concerned about the decision,” which is “bad news for online freedom of expression”.

Ms Morillon said the move “doesn’t just mean cultural adaptation but it means that Twitter will collaborate with the censors, and help them prevent the publication of criticism of the government or denunciations of corruption.” She noted that it remained to be seen how Twitter would implement the censorship. “Will it wait for a court order? Will a mere phone call from the local police chief be enough to delete a message, as has long been the case in China? Will it work with keywords?”

“China has for years made foreign businesses who want to operate on its soil sign self-censorship agreements, so now Twitter is also submitting itself to this pact,” Ms Morillon said. Twitter said it had not yet used its new ability but “if and when we are required to withhold a tweet in a specific country, we will attempt to let the user know, and we will clearly mark when the content has been withheld.”

Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey recently described China’s blanket block on the website as “unfortunate and disappointing”.

(Source: AFP)

Related story:

Wattan TV to broadcast Doha Debates with subtitles

Wattan TV, the award-winning Palestinian network, will soon begin broadcasting The Doha Debates with Arabic subtitles. Wattan TV has been operating in the occupied Palestinian Territories for the past 16 years. It is the second Arabic language TV network in the past month to announce that it will carry the award-winning debate programme, following a similar deal reached with Egypt’s Al Nahar TV.

The Doha Debates [televised eight times a year by BBC World News] are chaired by the award-winning former BBC correspondent and interviewer Tim Sebastian, who founded them in 2004 and secured their editorial independence. Commenting on the broadcast agreement, Tim Sebastian,  said: “I’m delighted that we have signed an agreement with Wattan TV. I hope our new audience will appreciate that debates can often increase understanding among people of different opinions and convictions. They are a chance, also, to challenge accepted wisdom and search for new answers. I hope they will prove both illuminating and surprising.”

Mu’amar Orabi, Wattan TV General Manager, maintained that this is the perfect time to begin screening the controversial show. “We are greatly interested in broadcasting ‘The Doha Debates,’” he said, “particularly at this period in time when media is playing a crucial role in shaping the future of the Middle East. Wattan has and will always be a free platform for expressing different opinions and for debate,” he added. “I believe such debates will encourage the public to think outside the box.”

Wattan TV will also promote ‘The Doha Debates’ through its website.

(Source: The Peninsula)

German public broadcasters seek HD cable carriage

German public service broadcasters ARD and ZDF are seeking cable carriage for their 10 new HD channels, which will be launched on April 30 2012, broadbandtvnews.com reports. However, the broadcasters are not prepared to pay a carriage fee for the new channels, but expect the cable operators to distribute their channels. So far, the cable operators have not agreed with this demand.

ARD and ZDF hope to save up to €60 million ($US77million) per year by not paying operators for distribution of their channels. Both broadcasters are closing down their analogue satellite transmission this April and will launch no less than 10 HD channels. These are the thematic channels ZDFneo, ZDFkultur, ZDFinfo, 3sat, Phoenix, Kika, and regional broadcasters SWR, BR, NDR and WDR.

More HD versions of regional broadcasters, all part of the ARD, will start in the years to come. The plan is to have HD versions of all public channels on satellite.

(Source: Asia-Pacific Broadcasting Union)

Guatemalan Mayans take fight to the airwaves

The Guatemalan government is cracking down on the country’s hundreds of pirate radio stations. Indigenous leaders say the 1996 Peace Accords give them the right to broadcast.

Without a license, broadcasting is illegal, says Eduardo Mendoza, secretary of Guatemala’s Chamber of Broadcasting. He explains that there are at least 800 pirate radio stations in Guatemala. While many of these do profit from broadcasting or serve a political or religious group, community-run stations like Radio Ixchel are deemed to be as menacing as the others.

But Radio Ixchel and the other community stations claim that they have a right to the airwaves, and that the current law is discriminatory. They cite the Guatemalan Peace Accords, which were signed in 1996 and ended 36 years of bloody civil war between the military government and leftist guerillas.

Fiji signals it may switch Radio Australia back on

Fiji’s coup-installed military government has signalled it is looking at allowing Radio Australia to broadcast inside the country again. Power to the two transmitters, one in Nadi and the other in Suva, was switched off by the interim government in 2009, three years after the 2006 coup led by military commander Frank Bainimarama.  But Fiji’s permanent secretary of information, Sharon Smith Johns told Pacific Beat’s Geraldine Coutts this morning that she is looking at reversing the policy.

South African regulator refuses TV porn channel bid

South Africa’s communications regulator, ICASA, has refused permission for satellite television network TopTV to broadcast three sexually explicit channels, TopTV said today. The Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (ICASA) said it would provide reasons later for its decision not to allow the broadcasting of the channels Playboy Europe, Private Spice and Adult XXX.

“We advise that the Council of the Authority … decided, after careful consideration, to refuse On Digital Media (Pty) Ltd’s application for the authorisation of (the proposed) video channels,” ICASA said in a letter to TopTV seen by Reuters. Pornographic material, including videos and magazines, is legal but regulators have blocked bids for sexually explicit channels on cable TV networks.

Last year, the DSTV broadcaster was forced to cancel its adults-only channel application in the face of consumer outrage and disapproval by senior government officials. TopTV is owned by On Digital Media. Among its shareholders is Luxembourg-based telecoms operator SES Astra. TopTV said it would not comment on the regulator’s decision until it had time to study ICASA’s reasons.

(Source: Reuters)

Related stories:

FBI seeking social media monitoring tool

The US Federal Bureau of Investigation is looking for a tool to mine social media for intelligence tips. The US domestic law enforcement agency is asking information technology contractors about the feasibility of building a tool that would “enhance its techniques for collecting and sharing ‘open source’ actionable intelligence.”

The 19 January open request was published on a website offering federal business opportunities and was first reported by New Scientist magazine. The FBI said it is seeking an “open source and social media alert, mapping and analysis application solution” for its Strategic Information and Operations Center (SIOC).

“Social media has become a primary source of intelligence because it has become the premier first response to key events and the primal alert to possible developing situations,” the FBI request said. “Intelligence analysts will often use social media to receive the first tip-off that a crisis has occurred,” it said.

The FBI said the tool “must have the ability to rapidly assemble critical open source information and intelligence that will allow SIOC to quickly vet, identity, and geo-locate breaking events, incidents and emerging threats.” It would need to be able to “instantly search and monitor key words and strings in all ‘publicly available’ tweets across the Twitter site and any other ‘publicly available’ social networking sites/forums.” It would also need the ability to “search the data across a myriad of parameters and view terrorist activities by location, terrorist group, and type of attack and see trends and analytics.” In addition, it would have to be able “to immediately translate into English, tweets and any other open forum publicly available social media captured in a foreign language.”

Interested parties have until 10 February to respond to the FBI request.

(Source: AFP)

Twitter to restrict user content in some countries

Twitter announced on Thursday that it would begin restricting Tweets in specific countries, renewing questions about how the social media platform will handle issues of free speech as it rapidly expands its global user base. Until now, Twitter had to remove a Tweet from its global network if it received a takedown request from a government. But the company said in a blog post published on Thursday that it now has the ability to selectively block a Tweet from appearing to users in one country.

“Starting today, we give ourselves the ability to reactively withhold content from users in a specific country while keeping it available in the rest of the world,” the Twitter blog said. Twitter gave as examples of restrictions it might cooperate with, such as “pro-Nazi content” in France and Germany, where it is banned.

It said even with the possibility of such restrictions, Twitter would not be able to coexist with some countries. “Some differ so much from our ideas that we will not be able to exist there,” it said. “As we continue to grow internationally, we will enter countries that have different ideas about the contours of freedom of expression,” Twitter wrote.

In the interest of transparency, Twitter said, it has built a mechanism to inform users in the event that a Tweet is being blocked. A Twitter spokeswoman declined to elaborate on the blog.

Twitter’s acknowledgement that it will censor content represents a significant departure from its tone just one year ago, when anti-government protesters in Tunisia, Egypt and other Arab countries coordinated mass demonstrations on the social network and, in the process, thrust Twitter’s disruptive potential into the global spotlight. As the revolutions brewed last January, Twitter signaled that it would take a hands-off approach to censoring content in a blog post entitled “The Tweets Must Flow.”

“We do not remove Tweets on the basis of their content,” the blog post read. “Our position on freedom of expression carries with it a mandate to protect our users’ right to speak freely and preserve their ability to contest having their private information revealed.” And last year, Twitter General Counsel Alex Macgillivray declared that the company was “from the free speech wing of the free speech party.”

Still, some open Internet advocates said it appeared Twitter did the best it could to navigate the dueling responsibilities of complying with local law and upholding free speech. Twitter would be banned outright in many countries if it did not agree to restrict Tweets, said Cynthia Wong of the Center for Technology & Democracy. “The question is: What’s best for freedom of speech?” Wong said. “If Twitter was completely blocked from certain countries, is that really better? It looks like Twitter has done a good job in thinking through how to mitigate the human rights harm in complying with local law.”

Twitter’s move highlighted the frequent tensions over freedom of speech and privacy issues between foreign governments and Internet companies such as Google and Facebook as they expand rapidly overseas. In 2010 Google relocated its Web search engine to Hong Kong, following a very public spat with the Chinese government over its refusal to bow to Beijing’s Web censorship requirements and a hacking episode that Google said it had traced to China.

(Source: Reuters)

Japan govt plants fake TV dramas to fight web piracy

The Japanese government is running a rather original project against piracy on the Internet. It is releasing on two popular file sharing networks, between 23 and 29 January, a series of files made to look like popular TV drama videos, but which will make a big surprise to unsuspecting users.

Named after some popular TV programmes, the files, when opened, are alerting users of popular file sharing networks Winny and Share to stop handling pirated media on the web. The message is that both uploading and downloading copyright protected media is illegal in Japan

The initiative belongs to the Japan Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications and is supposed to trace the future behavior of the users who download the fake TV shows. It is yet unclear if any users caught in the act will be prosecuted.

The ministry has partnered in the project with several associations active in the copyright field, according to Asiajin blog. Among them are the Association of Copyright for Computer Software, Recording Industry Association of Japan and the National Association of Commercial Broadcasters in Japan.

According to the Japanese press, about 150,000 people in the country are using the networks Winny and Share every day.

(Source: The Tokyo Times)

Bhutan Broadcasting Service launches 2nd TV channel

Bhutan Broadcasting Service officially launched its second Television channel on 21 January. The new channel known as BBS 2 will air current programmes and entertainment shows. BBS TV was first launched in 1999 with a daily one hour broadcast in Dzongkha and English. The news channel went nationwide in 2006.

The General Manager of BBS 2, Tashi Dorji, said one of the reasons being whenever the parliament sat in session, both the houses requesting live coverage for the sessions has regularly put BBS in a very uncomfortable position, and the only option was to broadcast both the houses live. “And the other aspect is since the launch of television in Bhutan, BBS never really had a very clear identity and by identity I mean do not mean the mandate. I am talking more in terms of the content where presently we have mix of news, current affairs, educational programmes, entertainment and sports.”

The General Manager added that now with the launch of the second channel, viewers have a choice. “If you are interested in watching the news and issue based programmes you can switch on to BBS. And if you want to watch healthy mix of entertainment and educational programmes, you can switch on to BBS channel 2.”

Tashi Dorji said that people are able to view their favourite programmes at their own convenience. “The launch of the 2nd Channel is a landmark in the history of BBS and more so because the launch was initiated without any additional manpower and equipment.

(Source: Bhutan Broadcasting Service)

Hackers attack Irish govt sites over new web law

Hackers attacked the websites of Ireland’s departments of finance and justice today in a protest against government plans to block websites that violate copyright laws. Officials said both websites were taken offline for a short time in the early hours of Wednesday in a denial of service attack, in which the sites were bombarded with a huge number of requests. “The government is aware of the potential threat of this type of cyber attack and … is coordinating a whole of government response to this threat,” the Department of Justice said in a statement.

A Twitter user associated with the Anonymous hacker group, @AnonOpsSweden, claimed responsibility for the attack, posting a series of tweets overnight encouraging hackers to attack the two sites. Junior Minister Sean Sherlock, who is coordinating government plans to allow the blocking of access to illegal websites, told public broadcaster RTE the attack was an “unjustifiable response” to efforts to comply with European Union laws.

In 2010, an attempt by a music company to force an internet service provider to block illegal file sharing websites failed after a judge ruled it was not allowed under Irish law. The government has said it is working to reform the law to allow courts to force providers to block illegal sites.

(Source: Reuters)

EU takes on Internet giants over use of personal data

The European Commission today launched a bid to make companies including Internet giants such as Google or Facebook give people more control of their personal data or be fined up to one million euros. The proposal, championed by EU Justice Commissioner Viviane Reding, would force all companies to get explicit consent from customers to collect their data, explain how it will be used, and allow users to totally erase their information. Failure to comply could cost a company a fine of up to one million euros ($1.30 million), or two percent of annual turnover.

“Personal data is in today’s world the currency of the digital market, and like any currency it has to be stable and it has to be trustworthy,” Ms Reding told a news conference after the EU executive endorsed her proposal. “Only if consumers trust that their data is well protected, will they continue to entrust businesses and authorities with it, buy online, accept new services,” she said.

Citing a survey showing 72 percent of Europeans worry their data may be misused, Ms Reding pressed her case to give people “the right to be forgotten” from the Internet by allowing them to make their data vanish from the web.

With each country in the 27-state European Union enforcing its own data protection laws, the legislation would create a single EU law for all nations as well as companies offering services in Europe, even if servers are overseas. This would save businesses 2.3 billion euros a year by eliminating a costly mountain of red tape that companies must navigate, Ms Reding argued.

Ms Reding’s goal is to give people greater control over their information in an era of social networking websites and “cloud” computing, technology allowing people to store pictures, documents and other data online. Another innovation would allow consumers to take data from one website, say Facebook, and move it to another like Google+.

But privately some EU officials say Ms Reding’s legislation is too complex and ambitious to enforce in a world of companies with global reach. Sources said the Luxembourg politician had to tone down some provisions. A previous draft of the legislation, for instance, had called for stiffer sanctions of 5.0 percent of turnover.

Ms Reding denied that the legislation, which now goes to the EU Parliament and national governments for approval, was watered down. But she acknowledged that it generated a lot of debate. “Some say it goes too far, and the others say it does not not go far enough. I say I am somewhere down the middle,” she said.

Ms Reding wants national data protection authorities to have the power to deal with complaints, carry out investigations and impose sanctions. The goal is to give people a “one-stop shop” to deal with data protection concerns. For example, a man in Austria could go to his national authority to ask Facebook, which has its European headquarters in Ireland, to erase his data, said Ms Reding.

Companies, for their part, would have to appoint a data protection officer, a requirement that already exists in Germany. Ms Ms Reding said small companies would be exempted from that rule. “This is a world of breathtaking possibilities and it should stay so,” Ms Reding said. “It should be a world of innovation but of course there are also dangers around these new technologies, especially concerning the losing of control of one’s personal data.”

(Source: AFP)

BBC Executive response to Trust interim report on Delivering Quality First

Today, the BBC Trust have published their interim report on Delivering Quality First, the BBC Executive’s proposed approach to meeting the constrained funding of the Licence Fee Settlement agreed with the Government in 2010. This follows a public consultation.

The BBC Trust’s interim findings can be found here.

The BBC Executive have responded: “We welcome the Trust’s endorsement of the majority of our Delivering Quality First proposals at this stage. We note their request for us to make some changes to our proposals in local radio and regional current affairs which we will be working on over the next two months. These proposals have required us to make some tough choices and we are glad that in the vast majority of cases we will be able to progress with changes we believe are necessary to ensure a future BBC that is sustainable, and able to offer the programmes and services most valued by licence fee payers.”

(Source: BBC Press Office)

RSF publishes the 2011/2012 Press Freedom Index

Reporters Without Borders (RSF) has published the latest Press Freedom Index today. The full version can be downloaded in PDF format. Older versions for comparison, and other background information, can be accessed from the Home Page.

Irish broadcast archiving scheme approved

A new funding scheme developed by the Broadcasting Authority of Ireland (BAI) to support the archiving of broadcast material has been approved by the Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources Pat Rabbitte TD. The aim of the Broadcast Archiving Scheme is to encourage and support the development of an archiving culture in the Irish broadcasting sector as a whole.

In particular three objectives are outlined:

  1. to develop an integrated approach to the archiving of programme material to include the promotion, development and safeguarding of Ireland’s broadcasting heritage (this includes the promotion of archiving of programme material which is of benefit to, and advances the standards of, Irish broadcasting.
  2. to develop suitable storage processes and formats to encourage and assist bodies in the restoration and/or storage of material recorded on failing, or soon to be obsolete formats.
  3. to provide fast and accurate access to programme materials by interested parties and to raise public awareness in the preservation and use of broadcast archive materials.

The Scheme will be financed through a percentage of the annual Broadcasting Fund derived from the TV licence fee. The BAI expects to issue a call for applications by the end of the second quarter of 2012.

Speaking about the announcement, Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources, Pat Rabbitte TD said “This is a very welcome development for both the broadcasting industry and Irish audiences. The Broadcast Archiving Scheme will contribute to the preservation of Ireland’s broadcasting heritage and provide the public with additional access to the very rich history and culture of broadcasting in Ireland. I wish the Scheme every success.”

Bob Collins Chairperson of the BAI said “The BAI welcomes the approval of the Broadcast Archiving Scheme. We are confident that the Scheme will be of benefit to all who share an interest in preserving Irish culture, history and experience. The Scheme was developed through engagement with a wide range of broadcasters and expert groups. We look forward to receiving applications to the first round of the Scheme in the coming months.”

Further information about the Scheme will be made available by the BAI in the coming months.

(Source: Broadcasting Authority of Ireland)